Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study designed an energetic composite system of Al/CuO/B/Viton to investigate the correlation between formulation parameters and underwater energy output. A series of formulations were constructed by adjusting the fuel-to-oxidizer equivalence ratio (Φ) from 1.5 to 3.0. The thermal decomposition behavior and reaction behavior were systematically characterized using TG-DSC, TG-FTIR, and XPS. The Al/B-based composite was configured as the central charge with an annular RDX shell, and its energy output characteristics were evaluated through underwater explosion tests. Based on multi-scale characterization and kinetic analysis, a thermochemical reaction pathway involving fluorination-initiated surface activation, thermite reaction, and boron oxidation is proposed for the boron-containing thermite. The B1 formulation (6 wt% B, 10 wt% Al) exhibited distinctive bimodal combustion with a total duration of approximately 100 ms and achieved a bubble energy of 1.80 MJ/kg. Among the tested equivalence ratios, Φ = 2.5 gave the highest bubble energy, with both A3 and B3 achieving comparable values of approximately 2.03 MJ/kg. To decouple the contribution of aluminum from density-related effects, LiF was used as an inert substitute for Al in control samples, which exhibited substantially lower bubble energy of approximately 1.26 MJ/kg, indicating that the energy output is closely related to the reactive Al/CuO/B system. These findings demonstrate that formulation design can systematically influence the partition of shock wave and bubble energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: