Key result
Wells score, D-dimer, troponin, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation differ between confirmed and excluded PE.
Why the study?
The study aimed to determine the association of clinical presentation, the Wells scoring system, and D-dimer values with MSCT pulmonary angiography.
Are clinical presentation, Wells score, and D-dimer values associated with the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients?
Case-Control
No
Are clinical presentation, Wells score, and D-dimer values associated with the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients?
A low clinical probability by Wells score combined with normal D-dimer safely excludes pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.
Low Wells score with normal D-dimer may aid PE exclusion in ED; supports but leaves open prospective validation before changing practice.
The aim of this study was to determine the association of clinical presentation, the Wells scoring system and D-dimer values with mSCt pulmonary angiography.A case control study was conducted in the emergency Department of the Clinical hospital Sveti Duh throughout 2019.Patients with a referral diagnosis of a pulmonary embolism were included in the study.Patients were divided into two groups.The first group consisted of patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism by mSCt pulmonary angiography or postmortem, and the second group consisted of patients excluded from pulmonary embolisms.for the Wells score, D-dimers, troponin, respiratory rate and peripheral blood oxygen saturation, statistically significant differences were found between groups of patients with confirmed or excluded pulmonary embolism (p <0.001).for heart rate, chest pain, syncope, and hemoptysis, no statistically significant differences were found between these two groups of patients.Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities was found by ultrasound in > 70% of patients with massive a pulmonary embolism.Pulmonary embolism was confirmed in all patients for whom a high risk was calculated according to the Wells score. in conclusion, a low degree of clinical probability (according to the Wells score), along with a normal concentration of D-dimer, are a sure strategy in excluding pulmonary embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damir Rošić (2022) conducted a case-control in pulmonary embolism. Wells score, D-dimer, and clinical presentation was evaluated on Confirmed pulmonary embolism by mSCt pulmonary angiography or postmortem (p=<0.001). Wells score, D-dimers, troponin, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were significantly different between patients with confirmed versus excluded pulmonary embolism (p <0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: