Key result
STABILISE achieves ~100% technical success in type B aortic dissection with complete false lumen obliteration.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess early and mid-term clinical outcomes with the STABILISE technique in managing acute type B aortic dissection.
Does the STABILISE technique improve early and mid-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute or subacute type B aortic dissection?
Systematic Review (n=100)
Does the STABILISE technique improve early and mid-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute or subacute type B aortic dissection?
The STABILISE technique for acute type B aortic dissection demonstrates high technical success and excellent false lumen obliteration, with acceptable early mortality but a notable 21% re-intervention rate.
STABILISE yields high technical success and false-lumen obliteration in acute TBAD; leaves open need for prospective trials on long-term durability.
INTRODUCTION: Stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) is an extended downstream endovascular management technique for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), that aimed to achieve complete aortic remodeling. This systematic review aimed to assess the early and mid-term clinical outcomes with STABILISE in the management of TBAD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed on the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases, which returned 195 studies. Five studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In total, one hundred patients with acute or subacute TBAD managed with STABILISE were included. All studies reported a technical success of 100%. Thirty-day mortality was estimated at 4% (4/100) with no further deaths documented during an estimated mean follow-up of 12.7 months (range 12-15 months). Five percent developed spinal cord ischemia and another 5% developed visceral artery occlusions. One case of aortic rupture during time of balloon inflation was reported. Rare complications included delayed retrograde dissection (1%), aortobronchial fistula (1%), and renal failure (1%). One case of disconnection between stent-graft and bare stent was documented. Six percent of patients developed endoleak, predominately type I. Overall re-intervention rate was 21%, as reported in all studies. Complete obliteration of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 99% of patients and in the abdominal aorta in 96% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: STABILISE technique carries promising early and mid-term outcomes with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity. Excellent results on complete false lumen obliteration were observed. However, the heterogeneity among available studies' methodology does not permit firm conclusions, and further prospective analyses are needed to study the long-term outcomes of STABILISE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotão et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in acute or subacute type B aortic dissection (n=100). STABILISE (Stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection) was evaluated on technical success. The STABILISE technique for acute or subacute type B aortic dissection achieved 100% technical success and 4% 30-day mortality, with complete thoracic false lumen obliteration in 99% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: