Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of a permanent magnet instead of an electromagnet has been proposed for the augmentation of the magnetic field of a railgun driven by a current of approximately 20 kA. A permanent magnet has the following advantages in comparison with conventional augmentations using additional turns: (1) simple configuration of the system, (2) temporally and spatially constant magnetic fields, and (3) high efficiency. Here, the operation of a conventional railgun and that of an augmented railgun using a permanent magnet are compared experimentally, and the usefulness of the permanent magnet is described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsuki et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: