Key result
Survey reveals ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks are most common, with 40% of anesthesiologists relying on colleagues.
Why the study?
In Turkey, no work was being conducted on regional anesthesia education, and statistics were lacking on the frequency of basic extremity block administration.
Cross-Sectional (n=377)
A survey of Turkish anesthesiologists reveals that colleagues and digital sources are frequently used for regional anesthesia training, with a significant majority avoiding block applications.
Reliance on colleagues for upper extremity blocks may limit standardization; leaves open whether formal curricula alter adoption among anesthesiologists.
BACKGROUND/AIMSPresently, in Turkey, there is no work being conducted on the period of regional anesthesia education, and there are no statistics available on the frequency with the administration of basic extremity blocks.The present survey was conducted on anesthesia doctors throughout Turkey to explorethe personal knowledge and competency of the participants.Simultaneously, this survey aimed to evaluate the information sources for regional anesthesia training in Turkey. MATERIAL and METHODSThe present study surveyed 377 anesthesia doctors in March 2017 through a questionnaire formulated on the Delphi platform.The voluntary participants were recruited from professional organizations, hospital portals, and Turkey's anesthesia departments.Descriptive analyses were conducted for statistical evaluation. RESULTSOf the total participants, 3.2% were professors, 3.2% were associate professor doctors, 7.4% were assistant professors, 64.5% were specialist doctors, and 21.8% were residents.In the segment concerning skill and information level self-evaluation for blocks, the most commonly performedact was infraclavicular block (26.8%).With regard to their "information source, " 40% of the participants chose "from my colleagues" for upper extremity blocks.The specialist training was the least popular information source for ultrasound-guided interscalene block, while the digital visual information sources were often consulted for the same. CONCLUSIONVarious sources have been identified as the source of information as much as the specialty training, more so in some blocks.A significant majority of the participants avoided block applications.In the future, it would be useful to collect data on a more comprehensive national scale to overcome the limitations of the present issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selvi et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Regional anesthesia education and competency (n=377). Survey on regional anesthesia education and competency was evaluated on Self-evaluated skill, information level, and application frequency for upper and lower extremity blocks. A survey of 377 Turkish anesthesiologists revealed that the most commonly performed block was the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block (26.8%), and 40% relied on colleagues as their primary information source for upper extremity blocks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: