Key result
Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block significantly reduced median 24-hour postoperative pain scores (3 vs 4, p=0.001) compared to IV fentanyl infusion in cardiac surgery patients.
Why the study?
Thoracic paravertebral block is advantageous for pain management in open cardiac surgery, prompting a comparison with intravenous fentanyl analgesia.
Does bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block improve perioperative analgesia and reduce opioid requirements compared to IV fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery through median sternotomy?
RCT (n=44)
Computer-generated permuted block randomization sequence
No
Does bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block improve perioperative analgesia and reduce opioid requirements compared to IV fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery through median sternotomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 4%
p-value: p=0.001
Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block provides superior perioperative analgesia and significantly reduces opioid requirements compared to IV fentanyl in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.
Supports paravertebral block over fentanyl for post-sternotomy analgesia; extends RCT evidence for regional techniques in cardiac surgery.
Background In patients who are undergoing open cardiac surgery, thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is advantageous for pain management. Our objective was to compare this type of block with intravenous Fentanyl analgesia in those patients. Methodology This prospective, randomized study included 44 patients who underwent open-heart surgery through a median sternotomy. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups (each with 22 subjects). Group I (Fentanyl group) ( n = 22): received fentanyl infusion 2 µg/kg/h after placing the endotracheal tube and stopped at the end of surgery. Group II (TPVB group) ( n = 22): Bilateral thoracic paravertebral catheters were inserted preoperative. Before induction, there was a maximum of 20 ml per side for each catheter, which received a bolus dose of 0.3 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine. Continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine at a rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h was administered through each catheter following intubation. The infusion was subsequently discontinued at the conclusion of the procedure. Results Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) was lower in patients of group II (TPVB group) than in patients of group I (fentanyl group); in group II at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 2,3,3, respectively, whereas median CCPOT in group I at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 3,4,4, respectively ( p -value < 0.05). In comparison with group I, there was a substantial decrease in the intraoperative fentanyl requirements of group II (343.6 µg ± 44.1 and 926.8 µg ± 117.4) ( p -value < 0.05). In comparison with group I (9 mg 2), the TPVB group’s postoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower (6.2 mg 2.3). P -value was less than 0.05. Conclusion Compared with IV fentanyl infusion, Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block was determined to be more effective in the operative and postoperative analgesia of patients who underwent heart surgery via median sternotomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kassim et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Open-heart surgery through a median sternotomy (n=44). Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block vs. IV fentanyl infusion (2 µg/kg/h) was evaluated on Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) score at 24 hours postoperative (p=0.001). Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block significantly reduced median 24-hour postoperative pain scores (3 vs 4, p=0.001) compared to IV fentanyl infusion in cardiac surgery patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: