Key result
Candy-plug technique achieves complete false lumen thrombosis in ~57% of chronic aortic dissection patients.
Why the study?
Does the candy-plug technique using an Excluder aortic extender achieve false lumen occlusion in patients with chronic aortic dissection?
Observational (n=7)
No
Does the candy-plug technique using an Excluder aortic extender achieve false lumen occlusion in patients with chronic aortic dissection?
The candy-plug technique using an Excluder aortic extender is technically feasible for false lumen occlusion in chronic aortic dissection, but complete thrombosis takes time, suggesting additional embolization may be needed in emergencies.
May warrant adjunctive embolics with candy-plug in ruptures; leaves open role pending prospective data.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogawa et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Chronic aortic dissection (n=7). Candy-plug technique using an Excluder aortic extender was evaluated on Clinical success (complete false lumen thrombosis). The candy-plug technique using an Excluder aortic extender achieved technical success in 86% and clinical success (complete false lumen thrombosis) in 57% of patients with chronic aortic dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: