Key result
Ultrasound shows high agreement with MRI for measuring muscle and adipose thickness in healthy participants.
Why the study?
Body composition assessment is essential to detect muscle loss, but reference methods like MRI are costly and routinely inaccessible in clinical practice.
Does ultrasound provide reliable and agreeable measurements of muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to MRI in healthy participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=35)
Does ultrasound provide reliable and agreeable measurements of muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to MRI in healthy participants?
Effect estimate: ICC >0.90
Ultrasound demonstrates high agreement with MRI for measuring muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness, supporting its potential use as a bedside tool for body composition assessment.
BACKGROUND: Low muscle mass is prevalent and has detrimental effects on morbidity and mortality. Body composition assessment is essential for early detection of muscle loss and malnutrition, yet reference methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are costly and routinely inaccessible in clinical practice. Ultrasound has emerged as a promising noninvasive, bedside tool for body composition assessment. AIM: To assess the agreement between ultrasound and MRI-measured muscle thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) and subcutaneous adipose thickness at the bicep and quadriceps. To investigate inter- and intra-operator reliability of ultrasound measurements. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 35 healthy participants. Ultrasound images were taken by two researchers. An MRI scan was conducted during the same research visit. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to test agreement of ultrasound against MRI, as well as inter- and intra-operator reliability. RESULTS: . High ICC of >0.90 were obtained for muscle and subcutaneous adipose thickness at all 5 sites when comparing ultrasound with MRI, and for the inter- and intra-operator reliability of ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy participants, ultrasound measures of muscle and subcutaneous adipose thickness had a high level of agreement compared with MRI measures. This highlights the potential to use ultrasound for body composition assessment in clinical practice and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=35). Ultrasound vs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated on Agreement between ultrasound and MRI-measured muscle thickness and cross-sectional area and subcutaneous adipose thickness (ICC >0.90). Ultrasound measures of muscle and subcutaneous adipose thickness demonstrated high agreement (ICC >0.90) compared with MRI measures in healthy participants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: