Key result
Children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes presented significantly higher levels of endothelial progenitor cells compared to healthy peers (p=0.026).
Why the study?
Do Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) and Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) correlate with clinical parameters as early biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in children with newly diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes?
Observational (n=65)
No
Do Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) and Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) correlate with clinical parameters as early biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in children with newly diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes?
p-value: p=0.026
EPCs and CECs show potential as early biomarkers reflecting endothelial injury and reconstruction in children with newly diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes, which may help in assessing future cardiovascular risk.
These correlations are hypothesis-generating for EPC/CEC ratios as endothelial markers in new pediatric T1D; prospective studies needed before clinical use.
= 0.03) only. In the study group, positive correlations of CECs with age, BMI at onset, and BMI in following years were observed. EPC/CEC ratios correlated positively with glucose levels at hospital admission and negatively with age, BMI, pH, and stimulated C-peptide level. We reveal a new potential for the application of EPCs and CECs as biomarkers, reflecting both endothelial injury and reconstruction processes in children with T1D. There is a need for further research in order to reduce cardiovascular risk in children with T1D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamiołkowska‐Sztabkowska et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Newly diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes (n=65). Newly diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes vs. Healthy peers was evaluated on Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) levels (p=0.026). Children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes presented significantly higher levels of endothelial progenitor cells compared to healthy peers (p=0.026).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: