Key result
Cardiac devices including CRT and ICDs remain essential for optimal heart failure management.
Why the study?
The rapidly increasing incidence of heart failure introduces a significant clinical burden, highlighting the need to review non-pharmacological cardiac device therapy as an essential component of optimal management.
Recent advancements in cardiac device therapy, such as conduction system pacing and cardiac contractility modulation, offer improved management options for heart failure patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emerging conduction system pacing may enhance CRT response in HF; leaves open superiority over biventricular pacing in randomized trials.
Background: The incidence of heart failure (HF) is rapidly increasing, introducing a significant burden and challenges in clinical practice. Non-pharmacological cardiac device therapy has been established as an essential component of optimal HF management, particularly for the prevention of sudden cardiac death and the improvement of HF symptoms, left ventricular (LV) systolic function, quality of life, and eventually survival.Current Concepts: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can correct atrioventricular or inter/intraventricular dyssynchrony, thereby improving LV systolic function. Recently, the concept of CRT is being expanded, including His bundle (HB), HB-optimized LV, left bundle branch (LBB), and LBB optimized LV pacing CRTs. Newly introduced CRT approaches by stimulating the cardiac conduction system are expected to correct dyssynchrony better and consequently exhibit better CRT outcomes than the conventional biventricular pacing CRT. The current versions of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) or CRT devices can continuously monitor multiple biosignals. CRT/ICD can calculate a single index by combining these multiple bio-signal data for early detection of HF aggravation. Recently, subcutaneous and transvenous ICDs showed comparable safety and efficacy in HF patients. In drug-refractory HF patients without LV dyssynchrony, cardiac contractility modulation therapy provides some promising results.Discussion and Conclusion: Recent technological advancements have improved the efficacy and safety of cardiac device therapy. Therefore, cardiac device therapy should be used more actively to manage HF patients better.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seung‐Jung Park (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure. Cardiac device therapy (CRT, ICD, CCM) was evaluated. Cardiac device therapies, including cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, have been established as essential components for optimal heart failure management.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: