Key result
PCI fails to reduce death or aborted sudden death vs OMT in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Revascularization is often recommended before defibrillator implantation under the assumption it reduces fatal ventricular arrhythmias, but this premise had not been evaluated in a randomized trial.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical and device therapy (OMT) reduce all-cause death or aborted sudden death in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, extensive coronary disease, and viable myocardium compared to OMT alone?
RCT (n=700)
randomized
Yes
Does percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical and device therapy (OMT) reduce all-cause death or aborted sudden death in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, extensive coronary disease, and viable myocardium compared to OMT alone?
Hazard Ratio: 1.03 (95% CI 0.82–1.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 41.6% vs 40.2%
p-value: p=0.80
In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, adding percutaneous coronary intervention to optimal medical therapy does not reduce all-cause mortality or aborted sudden death, challenging the assumption that revascularization reduces potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias.
Questions routine pre-ICD revascularization; leaves open its effect on ventricular arrhythmias pending randomized data.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmia is an important cause of mortality in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention is often recommended for these patients before implantation of a cardiac defibrillator because it is assumed that this may reduce the incidence of fatal and potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias, although this premise has not been evaluated in a randomized trial to date. METHODS: Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, extensive coronary disease, and viable myocardium were randomly assigned to receive either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical and device therapy (OMT) or OMT alone. The composite primary outcome was all-cause death or aborted sudden death (defined as an appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy or a resuscitated cardiac arrest) at a minimum of 24 months, analyzed as time to first event on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death or aborted sudden death, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy or sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and number of appropriate ICD therapies. RESULTS: Between August 28, 2013, and March 19, 2020, 700 patients were enrolled across 40 centers in the United Kingdom. A total of 347 patients were assigned to the PCI+OMT group and 353 to the OMT alone group. The mean age of participants was 69 years; 88% were male; 56% had hypertension; 41% had diabetes; and 53% had a clinical history of myocardial infarction. The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 28%; 53.1% had an implantable defibrillator inserted before randomization or during follow-up. All-cause death or aborted sudden death occurred in 144 patients (41.6%) in the PCI group and 142 patients (40.2%) in the OMT group (hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.82–1.30]; P =0.80). There was no between-group difference in the occurrence of any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: PCI was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality or aborted sudden death. In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, PCI is not beneficial solely for the purpose of reducing potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01920048.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perera et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (n=700). percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical and device therapy (OMT) vs. optimal medical and device therapy (OMT) alone was evaluated on all-cause death or aborted sudden death (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.30, p=0.80). PCI plus optimal medical therapy did not reduce all-cause death or aborted sudden death compared to medical therapy alone in ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.82-1.30; P=0.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: