Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supramolecular stereo multiblock copolymers consisting of poly( l -lactic acid) (PLLA) and poly( d -lactic acid) (PDLA) hard blocks, poly(ethylene- co -butylene) (PEB) soft blocks, and 2-ureido-4[1 H ]-pyrimidinone (UPy) self-complementary quadruple hydrogen-bonding units were prepared upon blending of UPy-end-functionalized PLLA–PEB–PLLA and PDLA–PEB–PDLA triblock oligomers. Supramolecular copolymers (SMPs) based on UPy-terminated PLLA–PEB–PLLAs or PDLA–PEB–PDLAs (denoted as l -SMPs and d -SMPs, respectively) are amorphous and noncrystallizable. However, the enantiomeric blends of l -SMPs and d -SMPs become crystalline and show relatively fast crystallization as a result of stereocomplexation of the PLLA and PDLA blocks. Stereocomplexes, rather than homocrystallites, are exclusively formed in the stereocomplexed SMPs (sc-SMPs) with various l -SMP/ d -SMP mixing ratios. Because of the preferential crystallization of PLLA and PDLA blocks, sc-SMPs show less ordered microphase-separated morphologies and different domain spacings than the l -SMPs and d -SMPs. Compared with those of the amorphous l -SMPs and d -SMPs, the tensile strength, moduli, and heat resistance of sc-SMPs are increased with the stereocomplex crystallization or an increase in stereocomplex content. The sc-SMPs exhibit thermally induced shape-memory behavior, and their shape deformation and recovery temperatures ( T d and T r, respectively) can be modulated over a wide temperature range by varying the crystallinity or stereocomplex content. The T d and T r of sc-SMPs increase from 70 to 100 °C with increasing stereocomplex content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: