Key result
Slow LV filling in CAD is associated with abnormal end-systolic volume and incoordinate wall motion.
Observational (n=111)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Slow left ventricular filling in coronary artery disease is primarily caused by elevated end-systolic volume and asynchronous wall motion during isovolumic relaxation.
To identify mechanisms underlying slow left ventricular filling in coronary artery disease, left ventriculograms from 93 patients and 18 normal subjects were digitised frame by frame and global and regional function analysed. In 54 patients peak normalised filling rates were above the lower 95% confidence limit of normal (2 X 9s-1) and in 39 they were below. Patients with slow filling had a lower ejection fraction, a higher end systolic volume, and less overall shape index change, although a larger percentage occurred during isovolumic relaxation owing to asynchronous relaxation. Stroke volume was not significantly different. Slow outward wall motion was associated with increased cavity volume and systolic hypokinesis. Wall motion was also appreciably asynchronous, with wide spreads in the times of peak outward velocity and termination of rapid outward movement between regions. Early outward movement usually started in the anterior region, with peak velocity occurring before mitral valve opening, and significantly earlier than that in the apex or the inferior region. Ventricular oscillations occurred during filling in 23 patients. This asynchronous wall movement was unrelated to the distribution of coronary artery disease, systolic hypokinesis, or Q waves on electrocardiograms but was similar to that occurring in mitral stenosis. The main causes of slow left ventricular filling in patients with coronary artery disease appear to be (a) failure to achieve a normal low end systolic volume, with associated loss of physiological changes in left ventricular cavity shape, and (b) incoordinate wall motion during isovolumic relaxation which dissipates energy normally coupled to rapid ventricular filling. The resulting slow and asynchronous wall motion may have clinical implications especially when the time available for left ventricular filling is short.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D G Gibson (1983) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=111). Slow left ventricular filling vs. Normal left ventricular filling was evaluated on Peak normalised filling rates and regional wall motion. Slow left ventricular filling in coronary artery disease was driven by failure to achieve a normal low end-systolic volume and incoordinate wall motion during isovolumic relaxation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: