Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rationale CO 2 is the main driver of many chemical processes in cave environments. Understanding CO 2 fluxes in a given cave system through monitoring campaigns has become a standard procedure in a wide variety of fields such as paleoclimatology or show cave management. However, conventional methods lack the resolution of isotopic data to capture many transient processes occurring in caves. Methods A novel approach using isotope ratio infrared spectrometry (IRIS) to monitor cave air pCO 2 , δ 13 C and δ 18 O values in situ was tested and compared with conventional monitoring methods (handheld pCO 2 meter and discrete cave air samples for conventional isotope ratio mass spectrometry). This also involved the development of a field‐deployable experimental setup to operate the equipment in rough cave environments. Results Comparison between data obtained by means of a Thermo Fisher Scientific Delta Ray IRIS instrument shows overall good agreement with conventional monitoring methods in terms of pCO 2 and δ 13 C values. In addition, IRIS allows the δ 18 O values of cave air CO 2 to be measured. Conclusions IRIS allows identification and tracking of processes at various timescales ranging from transient visitor impact on the cave atmosphere to seasonal trends in cave ventilation. However, the need for an uninterrupted power supply (110/220 V AC) and the relatively large dimensions of the equipment (698 × 1092 × 704 mm, 80 kg) limit the number of caves where deployment of the instrument is feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Töchterle et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: