Key result
BASILICA is a promising technique developed to mitigate the risk of iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Why the study?
Coronary artery ostium occlusion by native aortic valve leaflets during TAVR is a feared complication, prompting the development of leaflet disruption techniques like BASILICA.
BASILICA is a promising technique to mitigate the risk of iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction during TAVR in high-risk patients.
With continued technological advancement and technical improvement of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it has become a desirable treatment option for aortic valve stenosis. Its minimally invasive approach compared to surgical aortic valve replacement offers the treatment to a broader patient population, mainly non-surgical candidates. A feared complication of TAVR is the occlusion of coronary artery ostium by the native aortic valve leaflet due to its displacement by the expanded transcatheter valve. Bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction (BASILICA) is a technique developed to mitigate this risk by creating a lengthwise laceration of the left and/or right aortic valve leaflets prior to TAVR. Patient outcomes following TAVR with BASILICA have been promising. Meticulous preoperative examination, patient selection, and hemodynamic management are imperative. With continued refinement, BASILICA may further expand the application of TAVR to patients at high risk for coronary occlusion associated with the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2022) conducted a review in Aortic valve stenosis. BASILICA (Bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction) was evaluated. BASILICA is a promising technique developed to mitigate the risk of iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: