Key result
Transapical JenaValve valve-in-valve implantation appears feasible and safe at 30 days for degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses.
Why the study?
Is transapical valve-in-valve implantation of the JenaValve THV feasible and safe in patients with degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses?
Population
2 patients with degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses who are too ill for conventional repeat open heart surgery
Design
Case_series
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
Supports initial evaluation in high-risk Mitroflow degeneration; leaves open safety, durability, and generalizability in larger cohorts.
Case Report (n=2)
Is transapical valve-in-valve implantation of the JenaValve THV feasible and safe in patients with degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses?
Transapical valve-in-valve implantation of a JenaValve THV is a feasible alternative for high-risk patients with degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses, though increased pressure gradients should be expected.
Conradi et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses (n=2). Transapical valve-in-valve implantation of the JenaValve THV was evaluated on Feasibility and safety (survival and clinical condition at 30 days). Transapical valve-in-valve implantation of the JenaValve THV was successful in two patients with degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses, with both alive and in good clinical condition at 30 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: