Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To longitudinally evaluate motor development and predictive factors in school-age children with oesophageal atresia. DESIGN: Cohort study with prospective longitudinal follow-up. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a tertiary university paediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Children with oesophageal atresia born between January 1999 and May 2006 were assessed at 5 and 8 years of age. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME: Motor performance was evaluated at 5 and 8 years using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC). Additionally, we evaluated perinatal characteristics, duration of anaesthesia within the first 24 months, socioeconomic status, sports participation and school performance at time of follow-up and intelligence and sustained attention at the age of 8 years. RESULTS: In 5-year-olds (n=54), the mean (SD) z-score M-ABC was slightly, but significantly lower than age-predicted normative values (-0.75 (0.83), p<0.001). In 8-year-olds (n=49), the z-score M-ABC was -0.53 (0.91) (p<0.001), intelligence was normal, but sustained attention was impaired: z-score speed (-1.50 (1.73)) and raw score attentional fluctuation (3.99 (1.90)) (both p<0.001). Motor problems mainly concerned gross motor performance. Duration of anaesthesia and sustained attention were negatively associated with motor development; sports participation was positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration of anaesthesia and sustained attention problems were associated with gross motor problems in school-age patients with oesophageal atresia. Parental awareness of risks for motor problems may provide the opportunity to offer timely intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harmsen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: