Why the study?
The risk-benefit profile of TAVI in younger patients with severe aortic stenosis is less certain than in older intermediate- to high-risk patients.
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation provide safe and favorable outcomes in patients aged ≤70 years with severe aortic stenosis and prohibitive surgical risk?
Observational (n=39)
Yes
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation provide safe and favorable outcomes in patients aged ≤70 years with severe aortic stenosis and prohibitive surgical risk?
TAVI appears to be a safe and effective option with favorable mid-term survival for carefully selected younger patients (≤70 years) who have prohibitive surgical risk.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is emerging as an appealing management strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate, high or exceedingly high risk, but its risk-benefit profile in younger patients is less certain. We aimed to explore the outlook of patients aged 70 years or less and undergoing TAVI at 2 high-volume Italian institutions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected baseline, imaging, procedural and outcome features of patients with age ≤70 years in whom TAVI was attempted at participating centers between 2012 and 2021. Non-parametric tests and bootstrap resampling were used for inferential purposes. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included, out of >3000 screened with heart team involvement and >1500 receiving TAVI. Most common or relevant indications for TAVI reduced life expectancy (e.g. cardiogenic shock or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, active or recent extra-cardiac cancer, porcelain aorta, neurologic disability, cirrhosis, or prior surgical aortic valve replacement, as well as extreme cachexia, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria. At least two contemporary high-risk features were present in most cases. Transapical access was used in 5 (12.8%) cases, and a sheathless approach in 15 (38.5%). A variety of devices were used, including both balloon- and self-expandable devices. Clinical outcomes were satisfactory, despite the high-risk profile, at both short- and mid-term, with no in-hospital death, and 5.1% (95% confidence interval 0-12.8%) mortality at a median follow-up of 15 months (minimum 1; maximum 85). Notably, no case of significant valve deterioration requiring reintervention occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In carefully selected patients with 70 years or less of age and prohibitive risk for surgery or reduced life expectancy, TAVI represents a safe option with a favorable mid-term survival and low rate of adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted an observational in severe aortic stenosis (n=39). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on mortality (95% CI 0-12.8).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: