Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary We consider a model in accident theory which is a modified version of the one proposed and studied by Bates and Neyman (1952a). The model envisages a correlation between the two kinds of accident in the model of Bates and Neyman. We set up a test of significance that this correlation is zero. Some properties of the distribution arising from the modified approach are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kathleen Subrahmaniam (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: