Key result
Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi and PVC foci reduces PVC burden ~96% in vasovagal syncope.
Why the study?
Reports regarding comorbid premature ventricular contractions and vasovagal syncope are limited, and the impact of autonomic modulation on symptomatic PVCs in these patients required evaluation.
Does catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi and PVCs reduce PVC occurrence and modulate autonomic activity in patients with vasovagal syncope and symptomatic idiopathic PVCs?
Cohort (n=26)
No
Does catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi and PVCs reduce PVC occurrence and modulate autonomic activity in patients with vasovagal syncope and symptomatic idiopathic PVCs?
Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi and PVC foci may be an effective and safe treatment for patients with concomitant vasovagal syncope and idiopathic PVCs by modulating autonomic activity.
Hypothesis-generating for autonomic-targeted ablation in vasovagal syncope with PVCs; prospective RCTs needed before adoption.
Introduction There has been limited reports about the comorbid premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and vasovagal syncope (VVS). Deceleration capacity (DC) was demonstrated to be a quantitative evaluation to assess the cardiac vagal activity. This study sought to report the impact of autonomic modulation on symptomatic PVCs in VVS patients. Methods and Results Twenty-six VVS patients with symptomatic idiopathic PVCs were consecutively enrolled. Identification and catheter ablation of left atrial ganglionated plexi (GP) and PVCs were performed in 26 and 20 patients, respectively. Holter 24 h-electrocardiograms were performed before and after the procedure to evaluate DC and PVCs occurrence. Eighteen patients were subtyped as DC-dependent PVCs (D-PVCs) and eight as DC-independent PVCs groups (I-PVCs). In D-PVCs group, circadian rhythm of hourly PVCs was positively correlated with hourly DC (P < 0.05) while there was no correlation in I-PVCs group (P > 0.05). Fifty-three GPs with positive vagal response were successfully elicited (2.0 ± 0.8 per patient). PVCs failed to occur spontaneously nor to be induced in six patients. In the remaining 20 patients, PVCs foci identified were all located in the ventricular outflow tract region. Post-ablation DC decreased significantly from baseline (P < 0.05). During mean follow-up of 10.64 ± 6.84 months, syncope recurred in one patient and PVCs recurred in another. PVCs burden of the six patients in whom neither catheter ablation nor antiarrhythmic drugs were applied demonstrated a significant decrease during follow-up (P = 0.037). Conclusion Autonomic activities were involved in the occurrence of symptomatic idiopathic PVCs in some VVS patients. D-PVCs might be facilitated by increased vagal activities. Catheter ablation of GP and PVCs foci may be an effective, safe treatment in patients with concomitant VVS and idiopathic PVCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Vasovagal syncope with symptomatic idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (n=26). Catheter ablation of left atrial ganglionated plexi and PVCs vs. Baseline was evaluated on Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden per hour (p=<0.001). Catheter ablation of left atrial ganglionated plexi and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) foci significantly reduced PVC burden from 247.3 to 9.1 per hour (p<0.001) in patients with vasovagal syncope.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: