PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 20209 citationsOpen Access

Atrial and Ventricular Response to Treatment of Premature Ventricular Complexes.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does PVC treatment reduce ventricular arrhythmic burden and prevent left atrial dilation and LVEF decline in patients with PVC burden > 5000 beats/day?

Population

286 patients with premature ventricular complex (PVC) burden > 5000 beats/day on Holter monitoring

Comparison

PVC treatment vs Observation (no PVC treatment)

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

mean 9.40 ± 6.70 months and 9.40 ± 5.52 months

Authors

YCYi-sheng ChenWCWei-Di ChenYCYin-Huei Chen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support PVC treatment in high-burden patients; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm effects on LA size and LVEF.

Structured PICO

Does PVC treatment reduce ventricular arrhythmic burden and prevent left atrial dilation and LVEF decline in patients with PVC burden > 5000 beats/day?

P
Population
286 patients with premature ventricular complex (PVC) burden > 5000 beats/day on Holter monitoring
I
Intervention
PVC treatment
C
Comparator
Observation (no PVC treatment)
O
Outcome
Ventricular arrhythmic burden, left atrial (LA) diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at follow-upsurrogate

Treatment of premature ventricular complexes in patients with a high burden (>5000 beats/day) reduces ventricular arrhythmic burden and may prevent left atrial dilation and LVEF decline.

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd1dbea84844e355f0633https://doi.org/10.6515/acs.202009_36(5).20200307a
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share