Key result
Frailty assessments occur in 61% of UK vascular centers, primarily using the Clinical Frailty Scale.
Why the study?
Although frailty is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes and was introduced onto NVR proformas in 2019, current frailty assessment practices in UK vascular centres had not been captured.
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
Yes
There is significant variation in frailty assessment practices across UK vascular centres, highlighting the need for validated tools to guide patient care.
Variation in frailty assessment may affect care consistency across UK vascular centres; leaves open standardization and outcome validation in prospective studies.
Background: Frailty is an important clinical syndrome that is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. The assessment of frailty provides an opportunity to enhance patient care. The National Vascular Registry (NVR) introduced frailty categories on all vascular procedure proformas in 2019. The aim of this survey was to capture the current practice of frailty assessment in vascular centres in the UK. Methods: A nationwide survey was carried out of all UK vascular centres who enter procedural data onto the NVR database. The Qualtrics online survey tool was used to distribute the survey through mailing lists and social media. The survey captured data on location of centres who responded, how frailty data are collected and vascular surgeons’ opinions of frailty assessments. The survey was live from 29 March 2022 to 29 May 2022. Results: The survey received responses from 48 UK vascular surgeons based in 31 UK vascular centres. Frailty assessment was undertaken in 61% (19/31) of centres that responded, of which 68% (13/19) used a frailty assessment tool. The Clinical Frailty Scale was the most frequently used tool (77%; 10/13). Vascular consultants personally perform frailty assessments in 47% (9/19) of centres and most assessments take place in the ward setting (68%; 13/19). Frailty was re-evaluated in 21% (4/19) of centres. Frailty status influenced clinical practice in 63% (12/19) of vascular centres. 58% (7/12) of responders plan to assess frailty in the future. Clinician-perceived barriers to assessing frailty was unfamiliarly with the tools and concerns over validity. Conclusion: There is variation in how frailty is measured in UK vascular centres. Uncertainty and concerns over validation of tools are perceived barriers to assessing frailty. Further research should target validation of frailty tools and their role in guiding patient care in vascular surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hitchman et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Frailty assessment in vascular surgery (n=48). Frailty assessment practices was evaluated on Current practice of frailty assessment in UK vascular centres. Frailty assessment was undertaken in 61% of responding UK vascular centres, with the Clinical Frailty Scale being the most frequently used tool.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: