Key result
Dobutamine yields a smaller LV +dP/dt increase in rats with chronic infarcts versus controls.
Why the study?
Does dobutamine stimulation differentially affect systolic and diastolic properties in rats with chronic myocardial infarction?
Does dobutamine stimulation differentially affect systolic and diastolic properties in rats with chronic myocardial infarction?
Dobutamine stimulation reveals an impaired inotropic but preserved lusitropic response in rats with large chronic myocardial infarcts.
Caution advised extrapolating dobutamine responses from animal models; leaves open whether selective inotropic impairment occurs in human chronic MI.
In this article, the authors attempt to determine the effect of catecholamine stimulation on the systolic and diastolic properties of the left ventricle (LV) in rats with chronic infarction. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent coronary artery ligation at 8-10 weeks of age. Baseline hemodynamics were measured 1-2 months after infarction. Dobutamine was administered in bolus injections of increasing concentrations, and peak hemodynamic response after each dose was recorded. Rats were divided into three groups: controls (n = 14), rats with infarct size less than 30% of LV (n = 13), and rats with infarct size at least 30% of LV (n = 9). Baseline hemodynamics were similar among the three groups. There was no significant difference in the maximal response of LV systolic pressure and heart rate between the three groups. Left ventricle +dP/dt increased with dobutamine in all three groups, but rats with infarct size of at least 30% had a significantly smaller increase above baseline as compared with control rats. In contrast, LV -dP/dt increased to a similar degree in all three experimental groups with dobutamine. Although hemodynamics can be affected by loading conditions in the intact animal, the magnitude of the change in +dP/dt with unaltered -dP/dt suggests that there is an impaired inotropic but not lusitropic response to catecholamine stimulation in rats with large chronic myocardial infarcts. The findings imply a differential effect of beta-agonist stimulation on systolic and diastolic properties of the heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cove et al. (1995) studied Myocardial Infarction (n=36). Dobutamine vs. Control rats was evaluated on Hemodynamic response (LV systolic pressure, heart rate, +dP/dt, -dP/dt). Dobutamine administration in rats with large chronic myocardial infarcts resulted in a significantly smaller increase in LV +dP/dt compared to controls, suggesting an impaired inotropic response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: