Key result
Generalized joint hypermobility shows no association with altered body composition or muscle function versus controls.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the musculoskeletal system in women and men with Generalized Joint Hypermobility.
Are there differences in muscle strength, muscle power, and body composition between college-aged individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility and healthy controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=87)
Single-blind
No
Are there differences in muscle strength, muscle power, and body composition between college-aged individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility and healthy controls?
p-value: p=>.05
College-aged individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility do not have significant deficits in muscle strength, power, or body composition compared to healthy peers.
No differences in body composition or muscle metrics among young adults with GJH; leaves open associations with injury risk or other populations.
The aim of this study was an evaluation of the musculoskeletal system in women and men with Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH). The study included 87 participants- 40 with Generalized Joint Hypermobility (aged 21.2 ±1.8 years) and 47 (aged 21.0 ±1.3 years) in the control group (CG). The study included the Beighton score, the measurements of body composition, muscle flexibility (Straight Leg Raise test, Popliteal Angle test, Modified Thomas Test), and the measurements of muscle strength and muscle power. T-test and Mann-Whitney U Test were applied to assess the differences between independent groups. The study showed that there were no significant differences (p>.05) in the assessed body composition and the muscle flexibility between both women and men with GJH and the participants in the CG. Under isokinetic conditions for the non-dominant lower extremity, men from the CG received significantly higher (p = .02) flexion peak torque at 180°/s angular velocity. Women from the CG received a statistically significantly lower (p = .04) F/E ratio at 180°/s velocity. Under isometric conditions for both women and men with GJH, there were no statistically significant differences (p>.05) in the maximum torques in knee extension and flexion compared to the CG. For women and men with GJH, the maximum power in the lower extremities and jumping ability were not significantly different (p>.05) compared to the CG participants. The body composition, muscle flexibility, muscle strength, and muscle power of adults with Generalized Joint Hypermobility did not differ compared to healthy participants. The fact that there are no differences does not exclude the efficacy of strength training in increasing levels of muscle strength and its impact on body posture and proprioception or coordination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ewertowska et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Generalized Joint Hypermobility (n=87). Generalized Joint Hypermobility vs. Healthy participants without Generalized Joint Hypermobility was evaluated on Body composition, muscle flexibility, muscle strength, and muscle power (p=>.05). Generalized Joint Hypermobility in college-aged young adults was not associated with significant differences in body composition, muscle flexibility, muscle strength, or muscle power compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: