Key result
Extended thoracic cancer resection with CPB is safe electively but linked to high salvage mortality.
Why the study?
Resection of intrathoracic tumors using CPB is under-reported, and its role in treating locally advanced mediastinal and lung cancers remains a topic of ongoing debate.
Does extended resection with cardiopulmonary bypass improve survival and allow for safe tumor removal in patients with locally advanced thoracic cancer?
Observational (n=8)
No
Does extended resection with cardiopulmonary bypass improve survival and allow for safe tumor removal in patients with locally advanced thoracic cancer?
Cardiopulmonary bypass facilitates extended resection of locally advanced thoracic cancers with acceptable survival, particularly for elective surgical candidates rather than salvage cases.
May support selective CPB use in elective cases; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
BACKGROUND: Resection of intrathoracic tumor with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains a relatively under-reported intervention in literature, and its role in managing locally advanced mediastinal and lung cancers is a topic of ongoing debate. Our aim was to review our experience and assess the role of CPB for treating locally advanced mediastinal and lung cancers. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2020, this study initially included 10 patients with primary locally advanced thoracic malignancies with apparent adjacent cardiovascular invasion demonstrated by thoracic imaging scans. Operation was performed based on a multidisciplinary tumor board consensus. Eventually, 8 patients (3 primary lung cancers and 5 mediastinal cancers) received either salvage or elective resection with CPB; two completed surgery without requiring CPB. RESULTS: Regarding the extent of adjacent structure involvement, 4 patients presented with involvement of the superior vena cava (SVC), 1 involved the right atrium (RA), 2 involved the SVC and RA, and 1 involved the SVC, the origin of main pulmonary artery, and the ascending aorta. Thirty-day mortality occurred in two of three patients receiving salvage surgery due to respiratory insufficiency. With the long-term follow-up, one patient died of recurrence 25 months postoperatively, one survived with recurrence 30 months postoperatively, and four were alive without recurrence for 35, 36, 49, and 107 months after operations. CONCLUSION: In certain patients, particularly for elective surgical candidates rather than salvage resection, CPB allows for extended resection of locally advanced thoracic cancers with acceptable perioperative safety and survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Locally advanced thoracic cancer (n=8). Extended resection with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was evaluated on Perioperative safety and survival. Extended resection of locally advanced thoracic cancers with cardiopulmonary bypass is feasible and safe for elective surgical candidates, whereas salvage surgery was associated with high mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: