Key result
Higher fat-to-muscle ratio linked to ~380% greater insulin resistance odds in men with T1DM.
Why the study?
This study aimed to investigate the correlation of the fat-to-muscle ratio with insulin resistance and cardiometabolic disorders in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Is a higher fat-to-muscle ratio associated with increased odds of insulin resistance and cardiometabolic disorders in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus?
Observational (n=420)
Is a higher fat-to-muscle ratio associated with increased odds of insulin resistance and cardiometabolic disorders in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus?
Odds Ratio: 4.8 (95% CI 1.9–12.1)
A higher fat-to-muscle ratio is strongly associated with insulin resistance and cardiometabolic disorders in adults with type 1 diabetes, suggesting its potential utility as a risk stratification parameter.
Higher fat-to-muscle ratio may refine cardiometabolic risk stratification in T1DM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the correlation of the fat-to-muscle ratio (FMR) with insulin resistance (IR) and cardiometabolic disorders (CMD) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 420 adults with T1DM [52.6% men, median age 32.4 (24.5, 43.0) years]. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and FMR was calculated. The characteristics of the overall participants were compared between tertiles of FMR. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of FMR tertiles with IR and cardiometabolic risk factors. RESULTS: Median age and median haemoglobin A1c of all participants were 32.4 (24.5, 43.0) years and 7.4 (6.5, 8.7)%, respectively. The prevalence of IR and CMD was 18% and 38.6%. The FMR significantly differed between men and women [0.39 (0.31, 0.53) vs. 0.74 (0.63, 0.92), respectively, p < .001]. The proportion of IR and CMD gradually increased as the FMR increased. The multivariable-adjusted odd ratios for IR and CMD in FMR tertile 3 compared with tertile 1 were 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): (1.9, 12.1)] and 9.7 (95% CI: 4.2, 22.3), respectively, in men. For women, the corresponding odd ratios were 4.0 (95% CI: 1.2, 12.9) for IR and 5.8 (95% CI: 2.4, 13.6) for CMD. CONCLUSIONS: FMR is associated with IR and CMD in adults with T1DM and could be used as a promising parameter for targeting treatment in T1DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (n=420). Fat-to-muscle ratio (FMR) tertile 3 vs. FMR tertile 1 was evaluated on Insulin resistance (IR) in men (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.9-12.1). Higher fat-to-muscle ratio (tertile 3 vs 1) was associated with increased odds of insulin resistance (OR 4.8 in men; OR 4.0 in women) and cardiometabolic disorders in adults with T1DM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: