Key result
Hemopump and IABP both reduce intramyocardial stress and oxygen consumption in a calf ischemia model.
Why the study?
Does transvalvular axial flow Hemopump support compared to intraaortic balloon pump support improve myocardial mechanics, energetics, and hemodynamics in a bovine model of ischemic cardiac dysfunction?
Does transvalvular axial flow Hemopump support compared to intraaortic balloon pump support improve myocardial mechanics, energetics, and hemodynamics in a bovine model of ischemic cardiac dysfunction?
Both Hemopump and IABP support reduce intramyocardial stress and oxygen consumption in ischemic cardiac dysfunction, but via different mechanisms (preload reduction for Hemopump vs afterload reduction for IABP).
Supports distinct preload vs afterload unloading in ischemia; leaves open applicability to human mechanical circulatory support.
Unlike the mechanisms of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support, the mechanisms by which transvalvular axial flow Hemopump (HP) support benefit dysfunctional myocardium are less clearly understood. To help elucidate these mechanisms, hemodynamic, metabolic, and mechanical indexes of left ventricular function were measured during conditions of control, ischemic dysfunction, IABP support, and HP support. A large animal (calf) model of left ventricular dysfunction was created with multiple coronary ligations. Peak intraventricular pressure increased with HP support and decreased with IABP support. Intramyocardial pressure (an indicator of intramyocardial stress), time rate of pressure change (an indicator of contractility), and left ventricular myocardial oxygen consumption decreased with IABP and HP support. Left ventricular work decreased with HP support and increased with IABP support. During HP support, indexes of wall stress, work, and contractility, all primary determinants of oxygen consumption, were reduced. During IABP support, indexes of wall stress and contractility were reduced and external work increased. These changes were attributed primarily to changes in ventricular preload, and geometry for HP support, and to a reduction in afterload for IABP support. These findings support the hypothesis that both HP and IABP support reduce intramyocardial stress development and the corresponding oxygen consumption, although via different mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marks et al. (1999) studied Ischemic cardiac dysfunction. Transvalvular axial flow Hemopump (HP) and intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) vs. Control (ischemic dysfunction) was evaluated on Hemodynamic, metabolic, and mechanical indexes of left ventricular function. Hemopump and IABP support both reduced intramyocardial stress and oxygen consumption in a calf model of ischemic cardiac dysfunction, though via different mechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: