Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It was recently shown that there is a predominance of phase 1 introns near the cleavage site of signal peptides encoded by human genes [Tordai, H. and Patthy, L. (2004) Insertion of spliceosomal introns in proto‐splice sites: the case of secretory signal peptides. FEBS Lett. 575, 109–111]. It was suggested that this biased distribution was due to intron insertion at AG∣G proto‐splice sites. However, we found that there is no disproportional excess of AG∣G that would support insertion at proto‐splice sites. In fact, all nG∣G sites are enriched in the vicinity of the cleavage site. Additional analyses support an alternative scenario in which exon‐shuffling is largely responsible for such excess of phase 1 introns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vibranovski et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: