Key result
Elevated hs-CRP linked to ~231% higher odds of gestational hypertension.
Why the study?
Gestational hypertension is less investigated than preeclampsia despite evidence of an unfavourable postpartum cardiovascular profile, prompting investigation into hs-CRP levels and their cardiovascular implications across hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Do serum hs-CRP levels differ between women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and normotensive pregnancies?
Observational (n=123)
No
Do serum hs-CRP levels differ between women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and normotensive pregnancies?
Odds Ratio: 3.31 (95% CI 1.32–8.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 6441.12% vs 5095.61%
p-value: p=0.043
Elevated hs-CRP levels are more pronounced in women with gestational hypertension than in those with preeclampsia, suggesting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms and potentially higher long-term cardiovascular risk.
hs-CRP may aid gestational hypertension risk stratification; leaves open distinct preeclampsia mechanisms and long-term CV utility.
INTRODUCTION: Gestational hypertension is a less investigated hypertensive disorder of pregnancy than preeclampsia, but evidence exists of an unfavourable cardiovascular profile for women after such a pregnancy. AIM: To determine serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in women with preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and in normotensive pregnancy in order to assess the cardiovascular implications and to examine its correlations with some characteristics of women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six women with gestational hypertension, thirty-seven with preeclampsia, and fifty maternal and gestational age-matched controls were included in a single-center prospective clinical-epidemiological study. Serum hs-CRP levels were determined using ELISA method. RESULTS: Significantly higher hs-CRP levels were found in the gestational hypertension group than in the controls (p=0.043), but not in the preeclampsia group (p=0.445). The levels between the two pathological groups did not differ significantly (p=0.247). Odds ratio for hs-CRP levels higher than the provided cut-off was 3.31 (95% CI 1.32-8.29) for the presence of gestational hypertension. In the normotensive pregnant women, the hs-CRP levels had a positive correlation with BSA, pre-pregnancy and current BMI, but such correlations were absent in the hypertensive groups. There were no correlations with the maternal or gestational age, current weight gain in any of the groups or with the highest detected blood pressure in the pathological groups. These levels did not differ according to gravidity, smoking status and smoking during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of hs-CRP was more pronounced in women with gestational hypertension than in women with preeclampsia, which could indicate a different pathophysiological mechanism and a higher cardiovascular risk for those women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gencheva et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (n=123). Gestational hypertension vs. Normotensive pregnancy was evaluated on Serum hs-CRP levels (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.32-8.29, p=0.043). Women with gestational hypertension had significantly higher hs-CRP levels than normotensive controls, with levels above 5446 ng/ml associated with a 3.31 times higher odds of gestational hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: