Key result
Helical CTA detects important, previously unknown extra-arterial findings in ~6% of patients.
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of important extra-arterial findings detected on helical CTA, and are they adequately followed up?
Observational (n=624)
What is the prevalence of important extra-arterial findings detected on helical CTA, and are they adequately followed up?
Helical CTA identifies important incidental extra-arterial findings in approximately 5.6% of patients, though these lesions are frequently not adequately followed up by referring specialists.
Supports protocols to ensure follow-up of CTA incidental findings; leaves open outcome benefits from observational data.
AIM: To determine the prevalence and significance of extra-arterial findings detected prospectively on helical computed tomographic angiography (CTA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The official reports of 802 consecutive CTAs performed over a 4.5-year period on 624 patients and the reports of all radiographic follow-up studies were reviewed for identification of important extra-arterial findings. Medical records and imaging studies of all patients with previously unknown extra-arterial findings on CTA were reviewed to assess follow-up. In cases where follow-up was not indicated in the medical record, referring physicians were contacted directly. RESULTS: Important, previously unknown, extra-arterial findings were detected on 35 CTAs (4.4% of all CTAs, 5.6% of all patients), with 33 of 35 detected prospectively. Six lesions were consistent with and/or proven to be malignant. Important non-tumoural lesions were discovered on nine CTAs. Of 13 lesions with imaging features that were suspicious for malignancy. Five of these lesions proved to be benign, but radiographic and/or clinical follow-up was not obtained or could not be documented in eight patients. CONCLUSION: With the increasing use of CTA as a replacement for conventional angiography, careful attention should be paid to the visualized extra-arterial structures. Extra-vascular findings that are believed to be significant, may not be adequately followed-up by referring vascular specialists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katz et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing helical CT angiography (n=624). Helical CT angiography was evaluated on Important, previously unknown, extra-arterial findings. Helical CT angiography detected important, previously unknown extra-arterial findings in 5.6% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: