Key result
Aortic root replacement with valve reimplantation achieves ~96% 5-year survival at low-volume centers.
Why the study?
Most data on root replacement with aortic valve reimplantation stem from high-volume centers, raising concerns regarding generalizability and reproducibility in low-volume settings.
Does aortic root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve have acceptable perioperative and midterm outcomes when performed in a low-volume center?
Cohort (n=72)
No
Does aortic root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve have acceptable perioperative and midterm outcomes when performed in a low-volume center?
Aortic root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve is safe and feasible in low-volume centers, yielding mortality and reoperation rates comparable to high-volume centers.
Supports valve reimplantation feasibility at low-volume centers; leaves open need for prospective multicenter validation.
Background Most data after root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve originate from high-volume centers. This raises concerns about the generalizability of these data and the reproducibility of this complex procedure. Aim of this study is to assess the perioperative and midterm outcomes of this procedure in a low-volume center. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the data of 72 patients, who underwent root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve in a single center between 2011 and 2020. Time to event analysis was performed with Kaplan–Meier curves. Longitudinal analysis of serial echocardiographic data was performed with a mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression model. Results In-hospital mortality was 1.4%, with absence of any neurological events during the perioperative period. At midterm follow-up, two further patients died. Overall survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97–100%) and 96.3% (95% CI: 93.8–98.8%), respectively. During follow-up, five patients (6.9%) required reoperation on the aortic valve. The incidence of moderate and severe aortic regurgitation at 5 years was 6.6% (95% CI: 2.4–13.6%) and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1–3.2%), respectively. Mild aortic regurgitation at hospital discharge (p < 0.001) and cusp plication (p = 0.0121) were associated with a higher incidence of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation at follow-up. Conclusion Reimplantation of the aortic valve is safe and feasible even in a low-volume center. Mortality, freedom from reoperation, and incidence of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation at follow-up are comparable to those of high-volume centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntinopoulos et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Aortic root replacement (n=72). Aortic root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve was evaluated on Overall survival at 5 years (95% CI 93.8-98.8). Aortic root replacement with reimplantation of the aortic valve at a low-volume center achieved a 96.3% overall survival rate at 5 years (95% CI 93.8-98.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: