Key result
David-V valve-sparing aortic root replacement yields ~96% survival out to seven years.
Observational (n=54)
No
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the David-V technique demonstrates excellent mid-term survival and freedom from re-operation in patients with aortic root aneurysms.
May support David-V technique in aortic root aneurysms; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of durability.
Background: This study aims to report early and midterm results of valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation technique. Methods: A total of 54 consecutive patients (44 males, 10 females; mean age 58±12.3 years; range 26 to 80 years) who underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the David-V technique performed by a single surgeon at a single center between January 2008 and June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was %1.9. The median follow-up was 57.5 (range, 29.5 to 77) months. Two patients developed severe aortic insufficiency during the first year following surgery and underwent aortic valve replacement. Estimated survival rates were 96.2±0.03%, 96.2±0.03% and 96.2±0.03% at one, five, and seven years, respectively. Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency-free survival rates were 96.2±0.03%, 96.2±0.03% and 96.2±0.03% at one, five, and seven years, respectively. Survival rates free from valve related re-operation at one, five, and seven years were 96.2±0.03%, 96.2±0.03% and 96.2±0.03% respectively. Conclusion: Our early and mid-term results of the valvesparing root reimplantation procedures for aortic root aneurysms are excellent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ertan Demirdaş (2016) conducted an observational in Aortic root aneurysm (n=54). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David-V technique) was evaluated on Estimated survival rate at 1, 5, and 7 years. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the David-V technique resulted in an in-hospital mortality rate of 1.9% and estimated survival rates of 96.2% at one, five, and seven years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: