Key result
Prehospital ticagrelor shows no difference in bleeding compared to clopidogrel in STEMI patients.
Why the study?
Does prehospital initiation of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel increase bleeding in patients with STEMI?
Observational (n=613)
Yes
Does prehospital initiation of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel increase bleeding in patients with STEMI?
Odds Ratio: 1.16 (95% CI 0.78–1.74)
Absolute Event Rate: 20.1% vs 17.8%
p-value: p=0.47
Prehospital initiation of ticagrelor in STEMI patients appears to have a similar safety profile regarding bleeding and short-term thrombotic events compared to clopidogrel.
No increased bleeding risk seen with prehospital ticagrelor in STEMI; leaves open net benefit versus clopidogrel in randomized studies.
Objectives The objective of this registry was to study the safety of prehospital initiation of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Background Ticagrelor has replaced clopidogrel in many hospitals as the routinely used antiplatelet drug in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Nevertheless, in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor was associated with an increase in non-CABG (non–coronary artery bypass grafting)-related major bleeding. Data comparing the safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment are not available. Methods A retrospective, multicenter registry was performed. Selection criteria were the administration of a prehospital loading dose of ticagrelor or clopidogrel according to the ambulance STEMI treatment protocol and the presentation to a percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospital in our region between January 2011 and December 2012. Follow-up was performed using the electronic patient files for the time period between the antiplatelet loading dose and hospital discharge. The data were analyzed using a primary bleeding end point (any bleeding) and a secondary thrombotic end point (all-cause mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or transient ischemic attack). Results Data of 304 clopidogrel-treated and 309 ticagrelor-treated patients were available for analysis. No significant difference in bleeding rate was observed between both groups, using univariate (17.8 vs. 20.1%; p = 0.47; odds ratio, 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.74]) and multivariate (p = 0.42) analysis. Also for the secondary thrombotic end point (6.3 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.45), no significant differences were observed. Conclusion In this real-world registry, no significant differences in bleeding or thrombotic event rate were found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergmeijer et al. (2018) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=613). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on any bleeding (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.78-1.74, p=0.47). Prehospital initiation of ticagrelor was not associated with a significant difference in any bleeding compared to clopidogrel in STEMI patients (20.1% vs 17.8%; OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.78-1.74; P=0.47).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: