Systematic Review
This guideline provides recommendations for the systematic evaluation of depression, emphasizing the assessment of subtype, severity, suicidality, and comorbidities.
Requires detailed depression phenotyping at presentation to guide therapy and prognosis; reinforces consensus on individualized management in psychiatric guidelines.
ObjectivesZZThe aim of this study is to develop guideline for evaluation of depression.MethodsZZDevelopment of this guideline was processed according to the ADAPTE manual, which was developed for adaptation of good clinical practice guidelines.Important key questions were determined, and a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines was performed.The contents of guidelines selected by comparison of the methodological quality and currency were evaluated with regard to the applicability and acceptability.Answers to key questions and clinical recommendations were established by peer review.ResultsZZCareful evaluations on the characteristics of depression, including subtype, severity, suicidality, and psychiatric and physical comorbidities were recommended because these factors can have an influence on course and prognosis in treatment of depression.ConclusionZZThe results of this study may contribute to the systematic evaluation of depression, based on clinical importance.However, this guideline did not include systematic reviews regarding useful scales for evaluation of depression.In the future, amendment of this guideline might be needed in order to supplement limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moon et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Depression. Clinical evaluation of depression characteristics (subtype, severity, suicidality, and comorbidities) was evaluated. Careful evaluations of depression characteristics, including subtype, severity, suicidality, and psychiatric and physical comorbidities, are recommended as they influence treatment course and prognosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: