Key result
Apamin abolishes spontaneous inhibitory junction potentials in mouse colon while D-tubocurarine reduces them ~83%.
The study demonstrates that the properties of spontaneous inhibitory junction potentials in the mouse colon differ from those of evoked potentials, highlighting distinct pharmacological sensitivities.
Distinguishes spontaneous from evoked colonic inhibition in mice; leaves open whether similar mechanisms operate in human enteric disorders.
Intracellular microelectrodes were used to record spontaneous and evoked inhibitory junction potentials (IJP) from the circular muscle layer of the mid-distal region of the mouse isolated colon in the presence of nifedipine (1 micromol/L) and hyoscine (1 micromol/L). 2. The length of the tissue preparation (> 1 cm) or the presence of the mucosa had no effect on the frequency of spontaneous IJP. 3. Hexamethonium (500 micromol/L) reduced the frequency of spontaneous IJP to approximately 70% of the control frequency, whereas D-tubocurarine (280 micromol/L) reduced the frequency to approximately 17% of control. Apamin (250 nmol/L) abolished all spontaneous IJP activity. 4. The greater inhibition of spontaneous IJP in the presence of D-tubocurarine compared with hexamethonium is discussed as a possible 'apamin-like' effect. 5. Although electrically evoked IJP (single pulse at 15 V, 0.6 msec) were not significantly affected by hexamethonium, D-tubocurarine and apamin reduced the amplitude of evoked IJP to approximately 65 and 50% of control, respectively. 6. These results suggest that the properties of spontaneous IJP cannot be inferred by a study of evoked IJP alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Powell et al. (2001) studied this question. Hexamethonium, D-tubocurarine, and Apamin vs. Control was evaluated on Frequency of spontaneous inhibitory junction potentials (IJP) and amplitude of evoked IJP. In the mouse isolated colon, hexamethonium and D-tubocurarine reduced spontaneous inhibitory junction potentials to approximately 70% and 17% of control, respectively, while apamin abolished them.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: