November 1, 2013Open Access
Cross-sectional survey on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
Key result
Expert survey reveals mixed opinions on MIMVS contraindications, with 90% agreeing familiarity requires over twenty cases.
- n=20
Population
20 expert surgeons experienced in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS)
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
Expert opinions on MIMVS contraindications vary widely; leaves open standardized selection criteria and supports prospective validation of training thresholds.
Study Design
Type
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
Structured PICO
P
Population
20 expert surgeons experienced in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery who completed an online survey regarding contraindications and training.
E
Exposure
Survey regarding opinions on patient factors, mitral valve pathology, and surgical skills in MIMVS
O
Outcome
Opinions on contraindications to performing MIMVS and training/proficiency requirements
Expert consensus suggests MIMVS is widely accepted, with specific recommendations for minimum case volumes to achieve and maintain proficiency.
Cite This Study
Misfeld et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral valve pathology (n=20). Survey on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery was evaluated on Opinions on patient factors, mitral valve pathology, and surgical skills in MIMVS. A survey of 20 expert surgeons on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery revealed non-uniform opinions on contraindications, with 90% believing >20 cases are needed to gain familiarity.