Key result
Cochrane protocol plans to evaluate cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for pediatric general anesthesia.
Why the study?
Do cuffed endotracheal tubes compared to uncuffed endotracheal tubes improve outcomes in children up to eight years of age undergoing general anaesthesia?
Do cuffed endotracheal tubes compared to uncuffed endotracheal tubes improve outcomes in children up to eight years of age undergoing general anaesthesia?
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review to assess the risks and benefits of cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric anesthesia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol initiates evidence synthesis on cuffed versus uncuffed tubes; leaves open optimal choice in pediatric anesthesia.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the risks and benefits of cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes during general anaesthesia in children up to eight years of age, based on the best level of evidence available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orange et al. (2015) studied this question. Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for general anesthesia in children up to eight years of age are the focus of a Cochrane Review protocol to assess their risks and benefits.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: