Key result
This article is an editorial commentary on a registry analysis evaluating robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and early revision rates, and contains no original clinical data.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Commentary
Robotic-assisted TKA should not yet change revision-risk counseling; leaves open whether other endpoints or longer-term data differ from conventional techniques.
1Orthopaedic Surgeon, Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, VA, USA R. Sershon ✉, 2501 Parkers Lane, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22306, USA, Email: [email protected] This CORR Insights® is a commentary on the article "Robotic-assisted TKA is Not Associated With Decreased Odds of Early Revision: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry" by Kirchner and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002783. The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert A. Sershon (2023) reported an editorial. This article is an editorial commentary on a registry analysis evaluating robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and early revision rates, and contains no original clinical data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: