Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pillared interlayer clays (PILCs) were synthesized by pillaring montmorillonite with SiO 2, Al 2 O 3, and ZrO 2, and Co-supported PILCs were prepared by the impregnation method. For comparison, Co/SiO 2 and Co-supported montmorillonite treated with dilute HNO 3 (acid-clay) were also prepared. The materials were characterized by XRD, H 2 -TPR, NH 3 -TPD, O 2 titration, and N 2 adsorption−desorption. The Co-supported catalysts were comparatively investigated for Fischer−Tropsch (FT) synthesis in a fixed-bed reactor under the conditions of 1 MPa, 508 K, H 2 /CO = 2, and W / F = 5.02 g·h·mol −1 . The results indicate that the activities of the catalysts (i.e., CO conversions) increase in the order of Co/Na-Clay ≪ Co/Si-PILC ≈ Co/acid-clay ≈ Co/Al-PILC < Co/Zr-PILC ≈ Co/SiO 2 . Moreover, Co/PILCs can effectively narrow the product distribution of FT synthesis showing significantly increased C 5 −C 12 selectivity and much decreased C 21+ selectivity. The results are well explained based on the acidic properties of the PILCs together with the textural properties, pore size distributions, and reduction behaviors of the catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: