Key result
Transitioning parenteral to inhaled treprostinil in PAH highlights critical dose titration and patient selection considerations.
Case Report (n=2)
Transitioning stable PAH patients from parenteral to inhaled treprostinil is feasible but requires careful consideration of dose titration and patient selection.
Inhaled treprostinil offers alternative for stable PAH patients limited by SC/IV side effects; leaves open need for randomized comparative data.
Treprostinil is a potent prostacyclin vasodilator indicated for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, World Health Organization Group I). Previously, treprostinil was available only in subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) formulations. Availability of an inhaled formulation of treprostinil has provided clinicians with an alternative to continuous SC or IV treprostinil in appropriate patients. Stable PAH patients whose quality of life has been dramatically impacted by side effects of parenteral therapy or those who have had recurrent, life-threatening bloodstream infections but are otherwise responding well to treatment may be the candidates for continuing prostacyclin therapy with inhaled treprostinil. However, there is little clinical experience with transitioning patients from parenteral to inhaled treprostinil. We present the results of two cases that highlight important considerations in transitioning patients from parenteral to inhaled therapy, including the pharmacologic and clinical equivalence of formulations, dose titration of formulations and suggested criteria for patient selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raina et al. (2013) conducted a case report in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (n=2). Inhaled treprostinil vs. Parenteral treprostinil was evaluated on Transitioning considerations (pharmacologic and clinical equivalence, dose titration, patient selection). Transitioning from parenteral to inhaled treprostinil in two patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension highlighted important considerations regarding dose titration and patient selection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: