Prospective observational study reveals reduced adhesive skin injury rates with silicone dressings in spinal surgery, suggesting their advantage over acrylate.
This single-center prospective observational study aimed to compare the incidence, types, and characteristics of medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSI) in spinal surgery patients based on the type of dressing used. All adult patients who were scheduled for spinal surgery within a one-year period in a single institution were included. A structured case report form was created to collect data; a single assessor evaluated MARSI for eligible patients. Group differences were analysed with an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Within 10 days of surgery, 45% of 140 study participants developed MARSI, with contact dermatitis being the most common type (41.4%). The acrylate-dressing group had a higher cumulative incidence (56.8%) than the silicone group (31.8%) (p = 0.003) as well as a shorter time to the first MARSI (p < 0.001), longer MARSI duration (p < 0.001), and a 2.55-time higher risk of MARSI (p < 0.001). In summary, the use of post-operative dressings with silicone adhesives post-spinal surgery was associated with a lower incidence, longer time to the occurrence, shorter duration, and lower risk of MARSI compared to the use of acrylate dressings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: