Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modern video-based eye trackers have reached a level of accuracy sufficient for gaze-based human-computer interaction. In many but not all applications, accuracy even allows for replacing a computer mouse with gaze-based pointing. The Multi-Modal Interaction Concept for Efficient Input (M[Formula: see text]ice) tackles accuracy problems with an on-demand hybrid linear-fisheye magnifier. This paper explores how semantic analysis of screen content can be used as part of an alternative solution to the accuracy problem. This solution integrates machine-learning-based near real-time image analysis into the M[Formula: see text]ice interaction concept and adds semantic highlighting to screen elements near the user’s interaction point of gaze. Semantic highlighting identifies clickable screen elements and adds a number as well as a bounding box to each of these elements. This allows users to select elements with a keystroke. It thus combines visual magnification with visual semantic enrichment. The image analysis is based on a machine learning model specifically trained for the respective use case. A user study (n[Formula: see text]=[Formula: see text]20) showed no significant speed difference with the use of semantic highlighting but a 94.3[Formula: see text]% decrease in interaction errors (misclicks) with the use of semantic highlighting compared to the traditional selection and magnification approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eggenkemper et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: