I address the question of whether the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of a structured surface has the same value when the incident and reflected angles are reversed. In particular, I examine the validity of some recent counterexamples and contrary measurements. On the basis of a new definition for structured surfaces, I conclude that the BRDF should be reciprocal. I show that designed counterexamples are flawed and suggest that measurements that do not exhibit reciprocity can be attributed to uncertainty and uncontrolled factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William C. Snyder (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: