Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field experiments with barley were conducted on stubble of cereal grains in northcentral and central Alberta to determine the effect of N rate (25, 50, and 100 kg N/ha) on yield, N recovery and the relative efficiency (RE) of fall versus spring application of incorporated urea to barley. In most instances fall‐applied N was inferior to spring‐applied N and there were large differences in yield and N uptake of barley grain between fall‐ and spring‐applied N. The differences generally increased with increasing N rate for yield and N uptake, but decreased substantially for N use efficiency and % N recovery. As the N rate increased from 25 to 100 kg N/ha average RE of fall‐ versus spring‐applied N increased from 47 to 73% for yield increase and from 42 to 69% for N recovery. The increased RE with increasing N rate did not imply that the greatest level of N reduced the quantity of over‐winter N loss. Instead the results indicated that a lower proportion of the yield or N uptake was lost from fall application when the greatest rate of N was applied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malhi et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: