Key result
In patients receiving Impella support with a heparin purge, bleeding occurred in 39%, with prior intra-aortic balloon pump identified as a significant risk factor (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.072-5.830; p=0.034).
Why the study?
With increasing use of acute mechanical circulatory support, the study aimed to describe Impella anticoagulation patterns and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a heparin-based purge protocol.
What are the rates and risk factors for bleeding and thrombotic events in adult patients receiving Impella support with a heparin-based purge solution?
Observational (n=109)
No
What are the rates and risk factors for bleeding and thrombotic events in adult patients receiving Impella support with a heparin-based purge solution?
Odds Ratio: 2.5 (95% CI 1.072–5.83)
p-value: p=0.034
In patients receiving Impella support with a heparin-based purge solution, bleeding is common (39%), and prior intra-aortic balloon pump use is a significant risk factor for bleeding.
Prior IABP use may warrant heightened bleeding vigilance with Impella; leaves open optimal purge anticoagulation strategies.
The use of acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increased over the last decade. For patients with left-ventricular failure, an Impella ® (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) may be used to improve cardiac output. The purpose of this study is to describe Impella ® anticoagulation patterns and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of our protocol. This is a retrospective review of all adult patients who required at least 24 h of Impella ® support and received a heparin-based purge solution. In total, 109 patients were included in the final analysis. The most common indication for Impella ® device insertion was cardiogenic shock (76%) with the remaining patients receiving a device for a high-risk procedures; typically coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 9 thrombotic events occurred among 8 (7%) patients and 50 bleeding events occurred among 43 (39%) patients, with the most common classification being BARC 3a (60%). A univariate analysis revealed that patients were more likely to bleed if they were less than 65 years old, had an indication of cardiogenic shock for Impella ® , inserted the device peripherally, were on dual antiplatelet therapy, or had an intra-aortic balloon pump prior to Impella ® insertion, the latter of which was confirmed with a multivariate analysis (OR 2.5 [1.072–5.830]; p = 0.034). For those monitored by anti-Xa, the presence of two or more values greater than 0.40 IU/mL was a risk factor for bleeding ( p = 0.037). Our study identifies risk factors for bleeding in patients receiving temporary MCS with an Impella ® .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iskaros et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Left-ventricular failure requiring Impella support (n=109). Impella support with heparin-based purge solution was evaluated on Bleeding events (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.072-5.830, p=0.034). In patients receiving Impella support with a heparin purge, bleeding occurred in 39%, with prior intra-aortic balloon pump identified as a significant risk factor (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.072-5.830; p=0.034).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: