Key result
Women with abdominal aortic aneurysms had significantly narrower, shorter, and more angulated aneurysm necks and were less likely to meet EVAR instructions for use criteria than men (p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Sex-specific anatomical differences may contribute to observed disparities in outcomes and suitability for EVAR between men and women with AAAs.
Do women with abdominal aortic aneurysms have distinct vascular morphology affecting EVAR suitability compared to men?
Cohort (n=1,455)
Yes
Do women with abdominal aortic aneurysms have distinct vascular morphology affecting EVAR suitability compared to men?
p-value: p=<.001
Women with AAA exhibit distinct vascular morphology that adversely impacts EVAR suitability, highlighting the need for low-profile stent grafts and strategies for hostile neck anatomy.
Women may face lower EVAR suitability from hostile anatomy; leaves open whether sex-specific devices or selection criteria improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Sex specific anatomical differences may contribute to observed disparities in outcomes and suitability for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between men and women with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). This study aimed to assess these differences using fully automated volume segmentation (FAVS) and explore implications for EVAR suitability. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentre cohort study of patients undergoing elective AAA repair between 2013 and 2023 in three tertiary UK centres. Pre-operative computed tomography scans were analysed using FAVS software. Demographic and clinical outcome data were obtained from the National Vascular Registry. Propensity score matching (1:4 women:men) was performed, adjusting for age, cardiovascular risk, aortic size index (ASI), treatment modality, and centre. Morphological features and device specific likelihood to meet instructions for use (IFU) were compared by sex. RESULTS: Of 1 455 eligible patients, 145 women were matched to 580 men. Despite similar ASI and cardiovascular risk profiles, women had statistically significantly narrower, shorter, and more angulated aneurysm necks (p < .001), smaller visceral and access vessel diameters, and greater thoracic aorta and thrombus index (p < .050). However, no statistically significant differences were found in calcification volume or vessel tortuosity. Women were statistically significantly less likely to meet IFU criteria across proximal, distal, and access vessel parameters (p < .001). CONCLUSION: FAVS offers a scalable approach to pre-operative anatomical assessment and could guide future device design. Even after adjusting for body size and cardiovascular risk, women with AAA exhibit distinct vascular morphology that adversely impacts EVAR suitability. The development of low profile, durable stent grafts and strategies targeting hostile neck anatomy are critical to improving EVAR access and outcomes for women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawka et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) (n=1,455). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Morphological features and device specific likelihood to meet instructions for use (IFU) (p=<.001). Women with abdominal aortic aneurysms had significantly narrower, shorter, and more angulated aneurysm necks and were less likely to meet EVAR instructions for use criteria than men (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: