Key result
Intensive BP control in pediatric CKD yields mostly similar LV diastolic changes versus standard care.
Why the study?
The relationship between blood pressure control and left ventricular diastolic function in children with chronic kidney disease is uncertain.
Does intensive blood pressure control improve left ventricular diastolic function in children with chronic kidney disease?
RCT (n=124)
Open-label
randomised
Yes
Does intensive blood pressure control improve left ventricular diastolic function in children with chronic kidney disease?
Intensive blood pressure control may favorably impact some measures of left ventricular diastolic function in children with chronic kidney disease, though most echocardiographic measures showed similar annual changes compared to standard control.
Intensive BP lowering may improve select diastolic measures in children with CKD; extends RCT evidence on cardiac remodeling beyond LVMI.
BACKGROUND: Relationship between blood pressure (BP) control and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. The aim of this study is to investigate whether achieving lower BP yields a favourable impact on diastolic function. METHODS: We performed an exploratory analysis in the HOT-KID, a parallel group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (ISRCTN25006406). Children with CKD were randomised to standard (50th-75th percentile) or intensive (<40th percentile) standardised office systolic BP targets. Echocardiograms were performed at baseline and at follow-up visits. Diastolic function was assessed by early (E) and late mitral inflow (A) E/A ratio, mitral annular motion of myocardial relaxation (e') and atrial contraction (a') velocity, LV compliance of E/e' and e'/a' ratio, and left atrial volume index (LAVi) by a blinded observer. FINDINGS: per year, 95% CI: 0·22-1·42) in the standard (n = 60) compared to the intensive treatment arm (n = 64). However, the average annual changes in all other diastolic function measures were similar between standard and intensive treatment groups. There was no difference for overall adverse events or serious adverse events between the two treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: Our exploratory analysis in a small, open label RCT suggests that achieving lower blood pressure may favourably impact some measures of LV diastolic function in children with CKD. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation (PG/11/90/28,994); The authors MDS, PJC acknowledge financial support from the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre and Clinical Research Facilities awards to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. There are no relationships with industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in chronic kidney disease (n=124). Intensive blood pressure control vs. Standard blood pressure control (50th-75th percentile) was evaluated on Left ventricular diastolic function (95% CI 0.22-1.42). Intensive blood pressure control in children with CKD may favorably impact some measures of LV diastolic function, though most annual changes were similar to standard control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: