Key result
Left unilateral forced nostril breathing increases baroreflex sensitivity by ~20% over baseline in healthy men.
Why the study?
Unilateral forced nostril breathing can influence autonomic function via hemispheric activation, but its direct impact on baroreflex sensitivity remained unexplored.
Does unilateral forced nostril breathing improve baroreflex sensitivity and cardiovascular parameters in healthy young men?
Cross-Sectional (n=55)
No
Does unilateral forced nostril breathing improve baroreflex sensitivity and cardiovascular parameters in healthy young men?
Standardized Mean Difference: 3.63
Absolute Event Rate: 20.01% vs 16.73%
p-value: p=<0.001
Left unilateral forced nostril breathing produces substantial immediate improvements in baroreflex sensitivity and parasympathetic enhancement, suggesting potential as a nonpharmacological intervention for cardiovascular health.
May acutely enhance BRS via left UFNB in healthy men; hypothesis-generating for autonomic interventions pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is a crucial marker of autonomic cardiovascular control, and it is also a predictor of cardiovascular risk. Unilateral forced nostril breathing (UFNB) is one of the many types of pranayama, which are breathing techniques in Yoga. This type of breathing can influence autonomic function through hemispheric activation, yet its direct impact on BRS remains unexplored. To assess the immediate effects of left and right UFNB on BRS and cardiovascular parameters in healthy young adult men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a cross-section study, which included 55 healthy adult men (mean age 25.67 ± 5.89 years). The participants underwent the standardized protocols for measuring BRS, blood pressure, and heart rate during baseline and the 2-minute interventions of left and right UFNB. BRS was measured using the sequence method with Finapres technology. Paired t -tests were used to compare the baseline and the postintervention values. RESULTS: Performing left UFNB significantly increased BRS by 19.6% ( P < 0.001, d = 3.63), whereas the blood pressure and heart rate decreased (all P < 0.001), probably indicating profound activation of parasympathetic system. On the other hand, performing the right UFNB decreased BRS by 5.6% ( P = 0.012, d = 0.35) and also increased blood pressure and heart rate (all P < 0.01), probably suggesting a sympathetic activation. Waist circumference correlated negatively with the baseline BRS values ( r = −0.513, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Left UFNB produces substantial immediate improvements in BRS with parasympathetic enhancement, whereas right UFNB induces sympathetic activation. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic application for the use of UFNB in cardiovascular health management as a nonpharmacological intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandran et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=55). Left unilateral forced nostril breathing (UFNB) vs. Baseline resting conditions was evaluated on Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) (Cohen's d 3.63, p=<0.001). Left unilateral forced nostril breathing significantly increased baroreflex sensitivity by 19.6% (Cohen's d 3.63, p<0.001) compared to baseline in healthy young men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: