Key result
In cancer patients, direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists had similar rates of major bleeding events (15%, 17%, and 18%, respectively).
Why the study?
Do direct oral anticoagulants have similar safety and efficacy compared to low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists in adult cancer patients?
Observational (n=258)
No
Do direct oral anticoagulants have similar safety and efficacy compared to low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists in adult cancer patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 15% vs 17%
In cancer patients, direct oral anticoagulants showed similar major bleeding rates but potentially higher venous thromboembolism recurrence rates compared to low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists, highlighting the need for randomized trials.
Similar bleeding rates across agents in cancer do not support practice change; leaves open VTE recurrence questions pending RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in cancer patients is currently unclear. Low-molecular-weight heparin remains the standard of care for cancer patients with venous thromboembolism, with warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, as an alternative. Clear recommendations do not exist for patients with both active cancer and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The objectives of this study were to report safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonist in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism or non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult cancer patients from 2012 to 2015 who received an antineoplastic agent and an anticoagulant. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients were reviewed: 80 patients in direct oral anticoagulant group, 95 patients in low-molecular-weight heparin group, and 83 patients in vitamin K antagonist group. Sixty-seven percent of patients were on an anticoagulant for acute or chronic venous thromboembolism. Major bleeding events were similar across the groups (15% direct oral anticoagulant vs 17% low-molecular-weight heparin vs 18% vitamin K antagonist). The most common type of major bleeding event was gastrointestinal bleeding. A total of five fatal bleeding events occurred. Venous thromboembolism recurrence rates were higher in both direct oral anticoagulant (18%) and low-molecular-weight heparin (12%) groups while lower in vitamin K antagonist group (10%) compared to previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight heparin, or vitamin K antagonist had similar rates of major bleeding events, with gastrointestinal bleeding being the most common event. Venous thromboembolism recurrence rates were higher in direct oral anticoagulant and low-molecular-weight heparin groups than prior studies. Randomized trials are warranted to establish clear safety and efficacy in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pritchard et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Cancer with venous thromboembolism or non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=258). Direct oral anticoagulants vs. Low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin K antagonist was evaluated on Major bleeding events. In cancer patients, direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists had similar rates of major bleeding events (15%, 17%, and 18%, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: