Murine models demonstrate therapeutic synergy for the combination of interleukin-2, interferon-alpha and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. We treated 11 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a novel regimen consisting of in vivo primed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, interferon-alpha and interleukin-2. Patients received interferon-alpha before radical nephrectomy; in vivo primed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated and expanded in vitro. Low dose continuous infusion interleukin-2 at a dose of 2 x 10(6) units per m.2 per day was administered for 96 hours during each treatment week and interferon-alpha was administered as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of 6 x 10(6) units per m.2 per day on days 1 and 4 of the interleukin-2 infusion. No therapy was given during the last 3 days of a treatment week. One course of therapy consisted of 3 weeks of therapy followed by 3 weeks of rest. Patients were treated until maximal response, disease progression or dose limiting toxicity. A maximum of 6 courses of therapy were administered. Eleven patients underwent interferon-alpha priming and subsequent radical nephrectomy. In vivo primed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were successfully expanded in all 11 patients with an expansion index of greater than 170. In vivo primed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes maintained their lytic activity for greater than 5 to 8 weeks in culture as demonstrated in the 4-hour 51chromium release assay. Ten patients underwent multimodality biological therapy and 3 (30%, 95% confidence interval 6 to 65%) have achieved complete response (2 clinical and 1 surgical) with durations of 24+, 23+ and 5+ months. Patients with stable disease received no additional therapy. No deaths and no grade 4 toxicities occurred. Immunotherapy using a combination of interferon-alpha primed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, low dose continuous infusion interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha can induce significant and durable antitumor responses in some patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belldegrun et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: